Close Menu
New York Daily News Online
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    New York Daily News OnlineNew York Daily News Online
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Science
    • Books
    • Film
    • Music
    • Television
    • LifeStyle
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    New York Daily News Online
    Home»Politics

    Warsh Fed nomination hearing set for mid-April

    AdminBy AdminApril 4, 2026 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Warsh Fed nomination hearing set for mid-April

    Kevin Warsh, former governor of the US Federal Reserve, during the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Spring meetings at the IMF headquarters in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, April 25, 2025.

    Tierney L. Cross | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The Senate Banking Committee will hold a nomination hearing on April 16 for Kevin Warsh to be the next chair of the Federal Reserve, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC.

    Warsh’s nomination is moving ahead even as a separate criminal probe into the Fed continues, setting up a potential clash between the two parallel processes set in motion by the Trump administration.

    Banking Committee member Sen. Thom Tillis, R.-N.C. has said he won’t vote to confirm Warsh until the probe is resolved. Yet President Donald Trump is eager to get Warsh confirmed.

    Tillis’s opposition means Trump can’t do both. But by moving ahead with the hearing, he is trying to anyway.

    The committee hasn’t yet put the hearing on its public schedule. Warsh and a spokesman for the Senate Banking Committee declined to comment.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Politico earlier reported that the committee had scheduled the hearing.

    The criminal probe is looking into allegations that Jerome Powell, the current Fed chair, lied to Congress about the state of expensive renovations to the Fed’s offices. Powell has denounced the probe as a pretext to pressure him into lowering interest rates, as Trump has demanded.

    Congress tasked the Fed with setting interest rates independent of political considerations. Central banks that act independently generally do better at fighting inflation. The risk of reaccelerating prices is increasingly a concern in the U.S. as the Iran war raises energy costs.

    A federal judge has sided with Powell in the matter. Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday declined a motion by the government to reconsider his decision to quash subpoenas into the Fed. That means the subpoenas aren’t moving forward, and the status of the investigation is unclear.

    “We will absolutely appeal the judiciary’s interference with our access to the grand jury,” a spokesman for U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro said Saturday.

    Tillis’s office didn’t immediately return weekend requests for comment.

    Tillis has praised Warsh’s credentials but has said he won’t lift the blockade until his concerns for the Fed’s independence are lifted.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in March sent a critical letter to Warsh, predicting he would serve as a “rubber stamp for President Trump’s Wall Street First Agenda,” and accusing him of having learned “nothing from your failures” during a prior stint at the central bank.

    Warsh previously declined to comment on the letter. Federal nominees rarely speak to the public before their hearings.

    Meanwhile, other changes are afoot at the Department of Justice that could give prosecutors an opportunity to pivot on the Powell case. Trump on Thursday fired Attorney General Pam Bondi and appointed Todd Blanche temporarily as acting attorney general. He was a defense attorney for Trump before joining the administration.

    The administration has said that it is the Department of Justice’s decision whether or not to investigate Powell. But Trump has repeatedly signaled that he supports the investigation.

    “There is criminality” related to the Fed’s building expenses, Trump said on March 19.

    If so, the government hasn’t proved it to the judge.

    “The Government’s fundamental problem is that it has presented no evidence whatsoever of fraud,” Boasberg wrote in his ruling Friday.

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit

    you might also be interested in...

    Warner, Schiff probe potential insider trading in government

    Trump tariffs fall, but trade war impacts linger

    Trump threatens to destroy Iranian infrastructure

    Iran and Oman drafting protocol to ‘monitor’ Hormuz Strait traffic: IRNA

    Supreme Court birthright citizenship case focuses on birth tourism

    Iran’s war propaganda homes in on Trump with Lego memes

    Popular Posts

    Trump prepares pharmaceutical tariffs of up to 100%

    United announces Base Polaris business class with more restrictions

    50 Cent asks God to “forgive” his enemies for “misunderstanding” him on Good Friday

    Jason Blundell announces his new-new studio, Magic Fractal

    Artemis 2 in good shape cruising towards the moon

    Warner, Schiff probe potential insider trading in government

    Categories
    • Books (1,961)
    • Business (2,750)
    • Cover Story (37)
    • Events (65)
    • Film (1,407)
    • LifeStyle (2,247)
    • Music (2,316)
    • Politics (1,814)
    • Science (2,255)
    • Technology (2,198)
    • Television (2,330)
    • Uncategorized (33)
    • US News (2,596)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact
    • About
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 New York Daily News Online. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.