Close Menu
New York Daily News Online
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    New York Daily News OnlineNew York Daily News Online
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Science
    • Books
    • Film
    • Music
    • Television
    • LifeStyle
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    New York Daily News Online
    Home»US News

    Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order

    AdminBy AdminJune 30, 2026 US News
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order

    Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

    “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” the majority decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts said.

    The citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which was adopted in 1868, says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

    Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority ruling on 14th Amendment grounds.

    Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, but that it “does contravene a federal statute” adopted in 1940 that addresses the citizenship of people born in the U.S.

    The other three conservatives on the court, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, all wrote dissenting opinions.

    “The Court has made a serious mistake,” Alito wrote in his dissent to the ruling in the case, known as Trump v. Barbara.

    The court’s justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship.

    Trump attended the oral arguments, the first sitting president ever to do so.

    If Trump’s order had been upheld, it would have left tens of thousands of babies
    born in the U.S. each month to undocumented immigrants or visitors without American citizenship.

    “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post reacting to the ruling.

    “But we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process,” Trump said. “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!”

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Trump, on his first day back in the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, signed an executive order seeking to undo birthright citizenship.

    The order said that 30 days after its effective date, babies born in the U.S. were not entitled to be issued citizenship documents if their parents had immigrated illegally or were undocumented workers.

    Demonstrators rally in support of birthright citizenship outside the U.S. Supreme Court on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

    Mehmet Eser | Anadolu | Getty Images

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit

    you might also be interested in...

    Supreme Court lets Trump fire FTC member, boosts presidential power

    Waymo and Uber end robotaxi pilot in Phoenix

    Supreme Court rejects Trump appeal of E. Jean Carroll verdict

    Putin says Russia faces fuel shortages after Ukraine strikes

    China’s Zhipu is booming with Anthropic and OpenAI held back

    Trump threatens Iran with annihilation; Kuwait, Bahrain report attacks

    Popular Posts

    Eli Lilly, Regeneron in FDA PreCheck manufacturing program

    Agriculture Detail Fall U.S. Tour

    Sensitive iPhone Supplier Details Were Part Of Last Week’s Data Leak At Tata Electronics

    ESA to seek lunar mapping capability for Argonaut lander

    Lobbying push to nix Pentagon defense contractor share buyback ban

    The Best American Novels, According to Barnes & Noble

    Categories
    • Books (2,135)
    • Business (3,012)
    • Cover Story (47)
    • Events (82)
    • Feature (3)
    • Film (1,582)
    • LifeStyle (2,278)
    • Music (2,505)
    • Politics (1,988)
    • Science (2,428)
    • Technology (2,371)
    • Television (2,507)
    • Uncategorized (34)
    • US News (2,854)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact
    • About
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 New York Daily News Online. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.