Close Menu
New York Daily News Online
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    New York Daily News OnlineNew York Daily News Online
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Science
    • Books
    • Film
    • Music
    • Television
    • LifeStyle
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    New York Daily News Online
    Home»Politics

    Democrats make demands of USTR ahead of USMCA review

    AdminBy AdminMay 20, 2026 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Democrats make demands of USTR ahead of USMCA review

    Senator Tammy Baldwin and US trade representative, Jamieson Greer.

    Al Drago | Graeme Sloan | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    A group of Democratic senators will issue a set of demands to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer ahead of a mandatory joint review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement this summer.

    In a letter led by Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and shared exclusively with CNBC before being sent later Wednesday, 15 Democrats wrote to Greer to “insist that any revised agreement must deliver meaningful and measurable gains for American workers.”

    The USMCA, struck during President Donald Trump‘s first term, is up for review on July 1. While initially touted by Trump as “the fairest, most balanced, and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed into law,” the president has soured on the pact lately — slapping Mexico and Canada with tariffs during his second term.

    Greer has also, in testimony to Congress in December, said that “a rubber stamp of the Agreement is not in the national interest,” meaning that significant changes may be required to reapprove the agreement or disapprove and enter into a cycle of yearly reviews.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    The Democrats are demanding new provisions on the labor front of the agreement, asking that Greer use the review to “lift all boats by ensuring that both Canada and Mexico fully comply with their labor commitments.”

    The letter writers targeted seven priorities they would like to see addressed in the review. First was business relocations to Mexico. They said the USMCA has fallen short on keeping businesses in the U.S., pointing to manufacturing wages in Mexico, which they say create a wage gap that is leading to offshoring.

    “With workers in the Mexican automotive and electronics manufacturing sectors still only earning $3 to $5 per hour and Mexican manufacturing worker pay lower than in China, U.S. companies continue to offshore at alarming rates and use the threat of offshoring to depress U.S. wages,” the senators wrote.

    The lawmakers also called on Greer to push for Mexico to enforce its labor laws, a failure which they say has “both harmed Mexican workers and contributed to a persistent wage gap with American workers that leads to offshoring.”

    The Democrats also asked Greer to find new ways to enforce bans on goods created with forced labor, which they say all parties have failed to enforce.

    “The joint review should identify concrete actions all three parties can take to improve enforcement, including regular public reporting on enforcement data and protocols to share intelligence underpinning enforcement actions,” they wrote.

    Addressing Chinese investment, which also came up as an issue during Trump’s recent trip to Beijing, is also among the Democrats’ demands. They called to curb Chinese investment in Mexico specifically, alleging Chinese companies are setting up manufacturing facilities to skirt strict U.S. trade laws.

    “It is critical to address this loophole in the review of the Agreement to prevent its use as a backdoor to the North American economy by third-party actors, particularly our adversaries,” they wrote. “Combatting China’s unfair trade practices will take global cooperation, and the review can present a model of how countries can work together to counter this threat.”

    Another way the Democrats suggested countering China’s advance into the North American supply chain is by introducing new rules of origin requirements for additional sectors. China’s pervasiveness in components for manufactured goods like autos has recently become an issue in Washington.

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit

    you might also be interested in...

    Iran reviewing U.S. position on ending war; Trump willing to wait

    Congress is best chance to stop Trump ‘lawfare’ fund, attorneys say

    Senate advances measure to end military action in Iran in rebuke to Trump

    What does Russia need from China?

    ICE agent charged in Minnesota for shooting of immigrant

    CIA’s Ratcliffe visits Cuba as US demands political change

    Popular Posts

    Company cutting 17% of staff

    Walmart (WMT) earnings Q1 2027

    Watch Kevin Morby and Carrie Brownstein Perform Sleater-Kinney’s “Modern Girl”

    AMD Prices Its Ryzen AI Halo PC At $3,999, Unveils Ryzen AI Max 400 Chips

    The mysterious reason why women get hotter from age 18 to 42

    Congress is best chance to stop Trump ‘lawfare’ fund, attorneys say

    Categories
    • Books (2,055)
    • Business (2,891)
    • Cover Story (44)
    • Events (76)
    • Film (1,501)
    • LifeStyle (2,265)
    • Music (2,420)
    • Politics (1,907)
    • Science (2,348)
    • Technology (2,291)
    • Television (2,425)
    • Uncategorized (34)
    • US News (2,735)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact
    • About
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 New York Daily News Online. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.